Islamabad, Jan 21 : There is not enough evidence to
recommend the widespread use of statins in people with no previous history of
heart disease, according to a new Cochrane Systematic Review.
Researchers say statins should be prescribed with caution in those at
low risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).
CVD is the most common cause of
death, accounting for nearly a third of all deaths worldwide.
Cholesterol-lowering statins are first line treatments for heart patients and
the benefits are well established. However, there is less evidence that statins
are beneficial for preventing heart problems in those who have no history of
CVD. Given that low cholesterol has been shown to increase the risk of death
from other causes, statins may do more harm than good in some
patients.
The researchers reviewed data from 14 trials involving 34,272
patients. Outcomes in patients given statins were compared to outcomes in
patients given placebos or usual care.
Combined data from eight trials
involving 28,161 patients that provided data on deaths from all causes showed
that statins reduced the risk of dying from 9 to 8 deaths for every 1000 people
treated with statins each year. Statins reduced fatal and non-fatal events,
including heart attack, stroke and revascularization surgery, as well as blood
cholesterol levels.
However, the researchers say that the conclusions of
their review are limited by unclear, selective and potentially biased reporting
and that careful consideration should be given to patients' individual risk
profiles before prescribing statins.
"It is not as simple as just
extrapolating the effects from studies in people who have a history of heart
disease," said lead researcher Fiona Taylor, from the Cochrane Heart Group at
the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine in London, UK. "This review
highlights important shortcomings in our knowledge about the effects of statins
in people who have no previous history of CVD. The decision to prescribe statins
in this group should not be taken lightly."
The researchers point out
that all but one of the trials they reviewed were industry-sponsored. "We know
that industry-sponsored trials are more likely to report favourable results for
drugs versus placebos, so we have to be cautious about interpreting these
results," said Taylor. "The numbers eligible for treatment with statins are
potentially great so there might be motivations, for instance, to stop trials
earlier if interim results support their use."
A separate Cochrane
Systematic Review, conducted by some of the same authors, considered the effects
of combined approaches to reducing the risk of heart disease, including using
education and counselling to encourage people to change their diets and stop
smoking. The authors concluded that combined interventions had little or no
impact on deaths or disease caused by CVD. In an editorial accompanying the
reviews, Carl Heneghan, University of Oxford, concluded that, "Although various
multiple prevention strategies exist, the most effective and cost-effective
intervention for primary prevention in adults at low risk currently remains
unclear."
Ends
SA/EN
Home »
» Statins: Benefits questionable in low-risk patients, review finds
Statins: Benefits questionable in low-risk patients, review finds
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment