Singapore, Feb 7 : Internal reviews by banks in Singapore have
found evidence that traders colluded to manipulate rates in the offshore foreign
exchange market, according to a source with knowledge of the
inquiries.
The discovery widens a global lending rate scandal into new
markets, as fallout from the Libor case puts banks under added scrutiny and
spurs both regulators and institutions to reconsider how certain key interest
and currency rates are set.
The probes found evidence showing that
traders from several banks communicated with each other over electronic
messaging about what rates they were going to submit for the local banking
association's fixings for non-deliverable foreign exchange forwards (NDFs),
aiming to benefit their trading books.
"Traders were talking to traders,
saying: 'I need you to help me today, I need to fix low,'" said the bank source,
who asked not to be identified due to the confidential nature of the
reviews.
NDFs are derivatives that let companies and investors hedge or
speculate on emerging market currencies when exchange controls make it difficult
for foreigners to participate directly in the spot market.
The contracts
are settled in dollars, so there is no exchange of the underlying currency, but
they can affect spot exchange rates.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore
ordered banks that help set local interbank lending rates and NDF rates to
review the fixing process last year as U.S. and British regulators cracked down
on manipulation of the London interbank offered rate (Libor), a benchmark used
to set interest rates for around $600 trillion worth of securities.
The
investigations into Libor led to fines of $1.5 billion for UBS AG and $451
million for Barclays Plc for rate rigging. Regulatory probes stemming from the
Libor cases in the United States and Britain have also revealed evidence of
attempted manipulation of benchmark interbank lending rates in Tokyo, Hong Kong
and Australia.
Banking watchdogs in Britain and elsewhere in Europe have
begun trying to reform the way Libor and other interbank rates are set, to try
to ensure the numbers can't be manipulated.
The Singapore bank probes
show that the focus is now turning to other benchmarks, amid concern that they
too were manipulated.
The biggest banks in the Asian NDF markets include
UBS, JPMorgan Chase & Co, DBS Group Holdings Ltd and HSBC Holdings
Plc.
The source did not make specific comments about possible wrongdoing
by individual banks or traders has no independent evidence of such
wrongdoing.
UBS, JPMorgan, DBS and HSBC declined to comment. Media also
contacted the other 14 banks involved in setting NDF rates. Twelve said they had
no comment while two did not respond to repeated telephone and e-mail requests
for comment.
Under the NDF rate-setting process, organized by the
Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS), banks submit their reading of the spot
price for the Indonesian rupiah, Malaysian ringgit and Vietnamese dong every
working day.
A settlement rate for NDF contracts due to expire is then
calculated by taking the average of the submissions, excluding the highest and
lowest quarters of contributions from the banks.
While the exclusion of
the rates at the top and the bottom of the range is meant to ensure that one
bank cannot try to improperly skew the rate, the concern is that collusion by
traders at multiple banks could influence the result.
There are 18 banks
on the panel for the rupiah, 15 for the ringgit and 12 for the dong.
The
Monetary Authority of Singapore told banks in the city state last July to review
the way they set interbank lending rates, in the wake of the Libor
scandal.
As bank officials pored over documents and communications, they
came across evidence that raised alarm bells over activities in the NDF markets
as well, spurring an extension of the reviews to those markets in September, the
source said.
In Singapore, benchmark rates for both interbank lending and
certain NDFs are set by panels of banks organized by the ABS. Media calculates
and distributes the spot reference rates for the rupiah, ringgit and dong NDF
markets on behalf of the ABS, as well as other interbank lending and currency
rates. "Media supports any measures that create more robust benchmarks for the
market and we fully cooperate with regulators, authorities and benchmark
sponsors' investigations as required," a spokeswoman said.
In December,
the Monetary Authority of Singapore issued a statement setting out the banks'
obligations under the reviews, although it has not made clear whether it would
take action of its own based on the results.
"The banks have to
immediately report any irregularities they uncover to MAS, and have to take
appropriate disciplinary action against staff involved in such irregularities,"
the statement said.
"The reviews are ongoing, and it is premature to
speculate on the outcome of these reviews at this stage."
The central
bank provided no further comment when asked by media about the probes'
findings.
The source said most banks had submitted their reviews to the
authorities at the end of last year but did not say what disciplinary actions if
any were planned for banks or traders who tried to manipulate rates.
The
MAS said last year that it was working with the ABS to review the way NDF rates
and the city state's benchmark lending rates are set. The association declined
to comment for this story.
Banks dealing in over-the-counter products in
Singapore such as NDFs follow a code-of-conduct set by the Singapore Foreign
Exchange Market Committee, known as The Blue Book.
That includes a
requirement that: "dealers and brokers shall not engage in manipulative or
deceptive conduct or any form of conduct which would give other users of the
market a false or misleading impression as to prevailing market
conditions."
Trading volumes in the NDF markets are much smaller than for
derivatives linked to Libor, although they are hefty enough to effect spot rates
for the underlying emerging market currencies.
For the Indonesian rupiah,
the biggest market fixed in Singapore, daily turnover is estimated between $700
million and $1.3 billion, according to an HSBC report. Since NDFs are traded
over the counter, there is no fixed data on volumes.
Traders say even a
small movement in an NDF fixing could have a big impact on a bank's trading book
if it had a large number of contracts expiring.
Many of the traders
involved were junior and did not appear to think they were doing anything wrong,
said the source.
The NDF market in Singapore developed after the Asian
financial crisis, when capital fled the region causing several area currencies
including the rupiah to slump in value. NDFs gave banks a way around controls
that governments subsequently imposed on their currencies to curb those capital
flows.
Of the 40 to 50 NDF traders based in Singapore, roughly half had
either been put on leave, including those suspended while their activities in
the market were under investigation, or left their jobs during the Singapore
probes, the source said. It was not clear how many may have been or will be
reinstated after the probes' completion.
"A lot of banks are stuck,
traders are suspended or have left, so the market is seeing around half its
usual volume," the source said.
Flows in Indonesian rupiah and Malaysian
ringgit NDFs have been thin since the last quarter of 2012 IFR Markets, although
volumes in ringgit NDFs picked up at the start of this year.
The action
by U.S. authorities last month against UBS for its part in the Libor scandal
included a criminal charge against the Swiss bank's Japanese subsidiary for yen
Libor manipulation.
The charge sheet by the Commodities Futures Trading
Commission against the bank also revealed other markets in Asia where problems
emerged.
"Through its internal investigation, UBS identified evidence of
similar misconduct involving submissions for at least the Hong Kong Interbank
Offered Rate ("HIBOR"), the Singapore Interbank Offered Rate ("SIBOR"), the
Singapore Swap Offer Rate ("SOR") and the Australian Bank Bill Swap Rate
("BBSW")," a footnote in the charge sheet
read.
Ends
SA/EN
Home »
» Bank probes find manipulation in Singapore's offshore FX market
Bank probes find manipulation in Singapore's offshore FX market
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment