Kabul, Jan 30 : In 2004-5, I did a study on the future of the Taliban for Lieutenant
General Karl Eikenberry, who was then the commander of coalition forces in
Afghanistan. After the 2001 U.S.-led intervention, the Taliban had appeared on
the run, but three years later, they were making a comeback.
What I
found in the study was that the Karzai government was the chief enabler of the
resurgent Taliban movement. Afghan governmental corruption and incompetence was
making the Taliban look good in comparison, despite years of misrule when that
organization was in power. As a commander, and later as the U.S. ambassador in
Kabul, Eikenberry angered Afghan President Karzai by urging reform, and
ultimately failed in his attempts to get Karzai to clean up his government in a
meaningful way. Today, the Taliban are back in spades. This has damaged every
aspect of the U.S. war effort because it affects security, governance, rule of
law, and development. These are the pillars of coalition strategy in that
unhappy country.
Corruption is exacerbated by the highly centralized
Afghan form of government. All provincial (state) and district (county)
officials are appointed by the central government in Kabul. On paper, there is
nothing wrong with centralization. Many highly-developed democracies such as
Japan have basically the same system. It even semi-works in Iraq. Those
countries have good transportation and reliable communication systems. This
allows the central government to control things that go on in governance in the
provinces. None of that is true in Afghanistan. Consequently, it is nearly
impossible for the Kabul government to closely monitor the performance of
governance and development in the provinces, much less remove incompetent or
corrupt officials.
The most pernicious corruption in our province was
caused by the provincial commander of the Afghanistan National Police, the
provincial prosecutor, and the director of public health. The head cop was a
competent administrator, and kept the provincial capital relatively secure;
however, he did so by hoarding personnel and resources badly needed by the
outlying districts that he was supposed to be supervising. Outside the
provincial capital, he was making a handy side-living running a protection
racket for drug dealers and smugglers. Some of his handpicked appointees in my
district were running extortion and burglary rings.
The prosecutor was
making his money by encouraging defense lawyers from all over Afghanistan to
send their wealthy clients to our province where he could guarantee light
sentences or mere fines for serious offenses. The director of public health for
the province, one Dr. Tariq, is a real piece of work. Over three years, he
managed to misspend or divert $9 million dollars of World Bank funding, the vast
majority of which was U.S.-provided.
While working at the district level,
I had success in purging the worst of the bad cops in mid-level leadership
positions by threatening to invite Greg Jaffe of the Washington Post to report
on police corruption. This did cause the chief to replace to purge eight of
them. It was a small start, but a start.
Once I got to the provincial
capital as the governance advisor for the entire province, we caught a few
breaks; they were caused, not by blatant corruption, but by gender issues. What
finally did in the police chief was his reported rape of three female officers
who had the gall to file complaints. Although they were eventually forced to
retract their charges, a national uproar ensued, and the Afghan national
government was embarrassed enough to reassign the top cop. However, to the best
of my knowledge, he has not been held accountable for the rest of the corruption
he fostered.
The prosecutor became a target because there was national
level focus on the fact that many of his client protection scams were related to
so-called "honor killings." In these crimes, husbands or other relatives kill a
woman or girl for embarrassing the family by such heinous crimes as demanding a
divorce or working outside of the house. The scrutiny was encouraged by us, and
allowed our local national security directorate commander to organize a sting
operation that finally jailed him. However, before he could go to trial, the
former prosecutor used his connections to get permission to travel to Saudi
Arabia for the annual Haj religious pilgrimage. To the best of my knowledge, he
is still on the loose.
Despite our compiling a package on Dr. Tariq and
sending it to Kabul, he is still on the job. One of the most appalling charges
is that at least 11 women died in childbirth for lack of midwives that World
Bank funding had provided for the hiring of such medical personnel in the last
year alone.
Almost everyone in the province knew that all three of these
characters were bad actors, but no one could do anything about it because they
were hired and paid by Kabul. It took outside action by foreigners and the
public glare of the media to do what little that we could. Until the Afghan
government allows some form of local public review of provincial and district
officials, the government of Afghanistan will be its own worst
enemy.
Gary Anderson, a retired Marine Corps colonel, was a district
governance advisor in Afghanistan's Badghis Province. With transition of the
district to Afghan security control, he became the provincial governance and
rule of law advisor.
Ends
SA/EN
Home »
» Corruption in Afghanistan: An introduction to one fine mess
Corruption in Afghanistan: An introduction to one fine mess
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment