Huntsville, Feb 4 : A vintage rocket engine built to blast the first U.S. lunar mission
into Earth's orbit more than 40 years ago is again rumbling across the Southern
landscape.
The engine, known to NASA engineers as No. F-6049, was
supposed to help propel Apollo 11 into orbit in 1969, when NASA sent Neil
Armstrong and two other astronauts to the moon for the first time. The flight
went off without a hitch, but no thanks to the engine — it was grounded because
of a glitch during a test in Mississippi and later sent to the Smithsonian
Institution, where it sat for years.
Now, young engineers who weren't
even born when Armstrong took his one small step are using the bell-shaped motor
in tests to determine if technology from Apollo's reliable Saturn V design can
be improved for the next generation of U.S. missions back to the moon and beyond
by the 2020s.
They're learning to work with technical systems and
propellants not used since before the start of the space shuttle program, which
first launched in 1981.
Nick Case, 27, and other engineers at NASA's
Marshall Space Flight Center completed a series of 11 test-firings of the
F-6049's gas generator, a jet-like rocket which produces 30,000 pounds of thrust
and was used as a starter for the engine. They are trying to see whether a
second-generation version of the Apollo engine could produce even more thrust
and be operated with a throttle for deep-space exploration.
There are no
plans to send the old engine into space, but it could become a template for a
new generation of motors incorporating parts of its design.
In
NASA-speak, the old 18-foot-tall motor is called an F-1 engine. During moon
missions, five of them were arranged at the base of the 363-foot-tall Saturn V
system and fired together to power the rocket off the ground toward Earth
orbit.
The test used one part of the engine, the gas generator, which
powers the machinery to pump propellant into the main rocket chamber. It doesn't
produce the massive orange flame or clouds of smoke like that of a whole F-1,
but the sound was deafening as engineers fired the mechanism in an outdoor test
stand on a cool, sunny afternoon.
The device produced a plume that
resembled a blow torch the size of two buses and set fire to a grassy area,
which was quickly extinguished.
"It's not small," Case said. "It's pretty
beefy on its own."
And just like during the Apollo days, people in north
Alabama heard rockets thundering in the distance during tests at
Marshall.
"My wife and daughter were in our front yard and she said they
could hear it, which was pretty cool," Case said after an earlier test. "We live
about 15 miles away."
A single F-1 engine can produce 1.5 million pounds
of thrust using a fuel composed of liquid oxygen and refined kerosene, which was
not used in the space shuttle.
The tests were conducted at Marshall in a
project conducted with Dynetics Inc. and Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, which
are studying NASA's possibilities for deep-space missions years from now. The
space agency plans to use commercial launches to reach low Earth orbit; larger
rockets are required to escape the planet's gravity.
R.H. Coates, an
engineer who works with Case in Marshall's liquid propulsion office, said young
engineers can learn a lot from the work done by predecessors using slide-rules
in the 1960s, but no one wants to simply rebuild the old Saturn V
engine.
"This wouldn't be your daddy's F-1," Coates said. "We'd use new
materials and try to simplify it, update it."
Case started at Marshall as
a high school intern in 2002 and has been working there since graduating from
the University of Alabama in Huntsville in 2008. He said today's technology
allows things that weren't possible during the 1960s, but he has been impressed
by what he learned taking apart the unused Apollo 11 engine.
Engine No.
F-6049 didn't fit properly on the Apollo 11 rocket, but it is invaluable now as
a testing tool. Coates said a total of 85 F-1 engines were used on 17 Apollo
flights without a single failure.
About a dozen F-1 engines remain in
Huntsville, home of NASA's main propulsion center, and others are located
elsewhere. Most are on display; Case said engineers used engine No. F-6049 for
the tests because it was the most complete.
"It is really an excellent
booster," he said. "The guys in Apollo had it
right."
Ends
SA/EN
Home »
» NASA testing vintage engine from Apollo 11 rocket
NASA testing vintage engine from Apollo 11 rocket
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment