Riverside, Jan 20 : A lawyer for a California boy accused 
of murdering his neo-Nazi father urged a judge on Wednesday to convict his 
client of a lesser charge of voluntary manslaughter, citing what he termed an 
abusive upbringing.
But a prosecutor told the court that Joseph Hall, who 
both sides agree shot his father at point blank range in May 2011 when he was 10 
years old, knew at the time his actions were wrong, and that abuse allegations 
cited by the defense were a diversion.
"Joseph was not raised in the home 
described by the defense here," Riverside County Deputy District Attorney 
Michael Soccio said during his closing remarks in the high-profile trial. "It 
doesn't exist. It's fiction, a smoke screen, a red herring."
Defense 
lawyers concede that Hall, now 12, shot his 32-year-old father, a regional 
director of the National Socialist Movement, with his own gun, but argue that 
the boy should not be held criminally responsible.
The case in Riverside, 
60 miles east of Los Angeles, has made headlines because of Jeffrey Hall's 
neo-Nazi associations and the rarity of a parent being killed by a child so 
young.
Kathleen Heide, a criminologist who specializes in juvenile 
offenders, has said that 8,000 murder victims over the past 32 years were slain 
by their offspring, but only 16 of those crimes were committed by defendants 
aged 10 or younger.
Riverside County Superior Court Judge Jean Leonard, 
who is hearing the juvenile case without a jury, was expected to render her 
verdict on Monday.
Because Hall is a minor, the purpose of the trial is 
not to determine guilt or innocence, but whether certain allegations about his 
motives are true. If he is found responsible for the crime, he could be sent to 
a juvenile facility until he is 23.
Defense lawyers have said the boy was 
conditioned by his father's violent, racist behavior and that he killed him to 
put an end to physical abuse.
Defense attorney Matthew Hardy - who on 
Monday withdrew his young client's plea of not guilty by reason of insanity - 
told Leonard that Hall should be convicted of voluntary manslaughter because he 
was essentially acting in self-defense.
Hardy displayed a photo of Hall, 
his father and an unidentified young girl standing with a man who was wearing Ku 
Klux Klan robes. Hall was holding a toy gun in the picture.
"I put this 
photo up to show the type of conditioning Joseph had," he said. "This young man 
never had a chance in his life. He was pre-programmed to act 
immorally."
A psychologist called as a witness by the defense testified 
during the trial that the boy had been conditioned to violence by years of 
physical, emotional and likely sexual abuse.
But Soccio called Jeffrey 
Hall a "loving father" who taught his son to be nonviolent despite his own 
neo-Nazi ties, and said the boy "made the choice" to kill.
Prosecutors 
say Hall, who lived with four siblings, shot his father because he thought he 
was planning to divorce his stepmother, Krista McCary. Prosecutors said the boy 
was close to McCary and considered her his true mother.
"The proper 
finding should be murder," he said. "The evidence is ample that it was 
premeditated and planned."
Ends
SA/EN
Home »
 » Attorneys spar over fate of California boy who killed neo-Nazi dad
Attorneys spar over fate of California boy who killed neo-Nazi dad
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment