Kabul, Jan 16 :
There’s something wafting in the air in Afghanistan, and for once it’s not the
smell of detritus, diesel or cordite.
People – rivals, even enemies --
are talking about peace. Not just talks about talks – those have been going on –
and off – for a couple of years now. But serious, genuine moves toward
reconciliation are – for the first time since I can remember – actually
squeezing into an otherwise depressing narrative of stalemate and
loss.
Take the Pakistani government’s December 31 release from prison of
eight former Taliban members, including Taliban leader Mullah Omar’s right-hand
man and former justice minister, Mullah Turabi. This move, Afghan analysts say,
is part of a new strategy, formulated in a November meeting between Afghan and
Pakistani officials in Islamabad. The release, they say, was more than a
goodwill gesture between bitter rivals. The clear hope was that freed former
Taliban officials with the stature of Turabi would serve as emissaries, clearing
the way for peace talks between Hamid Karzai’s government and the current
Taliban leadership – based in Pakistan – and with the Pakistan government’s
blessing.
This was no isolated move. Eighteen other jailed Taliban were
released earlier in December, among them men who used to command Taliban units
in the field. Not surprisingly, official Afghan reaction has been quick and
positive. Ismail Qasimyar, a ranking member of the High Peace Council, Karzai’s
appointed group of diplomats seeking reconciliation, said the gesture "shows the
Pakistani authorities have opened a new chapter for positive cooperation with
Afghanistan." It’s the first time since the war began that I’ve seen Afghanistan
and Pakistan treat each other as potential partners, not
spoilers.
Pakistan’s military, believed by many to be supporting the
Afghan Taliban as a means of leveraging its influence with its chaotic neighbor,
is now jumping on the peace bandwagon as well. And it’s not just Pakistan’s Army
Chief Ashfaq Kayani, the alleged driving force behind the new rapprochement, who
is changing his tune.
Buried in the pre-holiday build-up, a semi-secret
meeting took place outside Paris between 20 key Afghan players, under the
auspices of a French think tank. Afghan government and opposition figures, and,
for the first time, insurgent leaders, including the Taliban and its offshoot,
Hezb-e-Islami, all sat down together. There were no breakthroughs, or even
concessions, but the point was to get all the warring sides to do something they
hadn’t done in some 30 years: talk directly to each other.
Officially,
the Taliban stuck to its public positions. It called the Afghan constitution
illegitimate and refused to negotiate with the "U.S. puppet" Karzai government,
but a positive momentum does seem to be building. More "secret" talks are set to
follow. The United Nations office in Kabul has invited the Taliban to a
conference there. Meanwhile, an official Taliban bureau will soon open in Qatar
for parallel talks with the United States.
Even the much-feared warlord
and former Mujahedeen commander Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, who was labeled a global
terrorist by the U.S. and has been on the lam for the past dozen years, is now
launching his own peace balloons. In an interview that appeared in the British
"Daily Telegraph," the man who, as prime minister in the 1990s, oversaw the
brutal flattening of much of Kabul, spells out a 10-point peace plan, calling on
all Afghan brothers to unite, asking "all the stakeholders within Afghanistan to
join hands for a workable solution for Afghanistan and resolve
disputes.’’
Cynics – and there are many – aren’t buying any of it. Their
arguments are well-known: They say civil war will break out as soon as the U.S.
and its allies go home; that the moderate Taliban may want to put down their AKs
and become a political force, but it’s the hard-core who rule, and who believe
they’re winning the war; that all the peace feelers are just ways of buying time
while the Afghan Taliban ratchets up its attacks on local security forces and
the Pakistani Taliban doubles down on its side of the border, most recently
killing a group of female NGO and aid workers.
All that rings true. But
then I take a deep breath –- and smell that very different smell -– and ask:
could this really be the turning point I’ve been writing about for so
long?
Jim Maceda is an NBC News foreign correspondent based in London and
currently on assignment in Kabul, who’s covered Afghanistan since the
1980s.
Ends
SA/EN
Home »
» Is peace really in the air in Afghanistan?
Is peace really in the air in Afghanistan?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment