Kabul, Dec 14: Facing a heavy domestic agenda and growing foreign policy tensions
in the seas to the east, it is unlikely that Afghanistan is going to be a major
priority for incoming Chinese leader Xi Jinping.
Unfortunately, this does
not mean the problems are going away. The contrasting fates of China’s large
extractive projects in Afghanistan highlight a number of growing issues for the
new administration in Beijing as the 2014 deadline for American withdrawal
imposed by President Obama looms ever closer.
Up in the north, CNPC has
started to extract oil from the ground in its project in the Amu Darya basin,
while southeast of Kabul at Mes Aynak, the giant copper mine run by
Metallurgical Corporation of China (MCC) and Jiangxi Copper has been put on hold
while the Chinese firms reassess their ambitious plans for a project described
by President Karzai as ‘one of the most important economic projects in Afghan
history’.
This state of affairs is quite a contrast to earlier this year,
when it emerged that CNPC was facing difficulties on the ground with reports of
Chinese engineers being harrassed on site. This was despite the generous terms
of the deal for Afghanistan: CNPC is paying 15 per cent royalty on oil, a 20 per
cent rate of corporate tax and will give 50-70 per cent of its profits to the
government, on top of building a new refinery. CNPC went into the deal with the
Karzai family-linked Watan Group as local partner. All in all a very careful
approach to investing in a risky country.
So the difficulties at the site
and the staff harassment were a setback. In response, President Karzai’s Beijing
visit in June included talks with CNPC, and also opened up discussions about
developing a new pipeline to get CNPC’s gas out of Turkmenistan. CNPC is keen to
develop another route to get gas out of South Yolatan, one of the world’s
largest fields, possibly through northern Afghanistan and
Tajikistan.
With the news that the field in Afghanistan is now producing,
it looks like CNPC has cemented its position as a key investor in Afghanistan.
The 25-year contract the company has signed has it extracting 1.5m barrels per
year, and it is currently looking to extract 1,950 per day.
In contrast,
the news from south east Afghanistan at Mes Aynak in Logar province is not
nearly as positive. There, China Metallurgical Group Corporation (MCC) and
Jiangxi Copper, the two Chinese state owned enterprises, were recently revealed
to have withdrawn some of their operatives from the site. The reason given was
security concerns with engineers reportedly spooked by a series of rocket
attacks. Two weeks after these stories surfaced in the press, MCC president Shen
Heting visited Kabul, meeting with Karzai and Minister of Mines Wahidullah
Shahrani. In official read-outs from the meetings, security concerns were high
on the agenda.
The picture may, however, be more complex than this. The
Chinese companies have been accused of dragging their feet on the project,
concerned about what is going to happen to the country after America officially
withdraws in 2014. The important Buddist acheological remains at Mes Aynak are
the subject of several campaigns, with researchers demanding more time to
preserve the remains before mining commences. And the long-awaited rail line
seems to be ever more distant.
Compensation for locals displaced by the
site and the various ancillary projects alongside it has been slow to
materialise. MCC also complained of Afghan partners being corrupt and
inefficient, as documented in a US diplomatic cable revealed by Wikileaks.
All in all, it seems as though the Chinese companies were questioning
their initial decision to invest. Looking back at the initial bids, it is clear
that the Chinese bid high: offering a total investment $2.9bn (a figure that has
been reported in fact as being as high as $4bn), $0.5bn more than the next
offer. There were generous provisions for the Afghan government: a maximum
royalty of 19.5 per cent and a bonus of $808m to the government as a signing
bonus (the next closest was $243m).
MCC is concerned, along with others
in the mining sector, about new legislation concerning mineral exploitation that
is to be ratified by the Afghan government. Beyond Afghanistan, MCC has had
other problems – its stock price in Shanghai has fallen from a high of over Rmb6
in 2009 to around Rmb2, and it recorded a net loss of $29m in the first half of
2012.
The contrast with CNPC’s experience in Amu Darya is stark. While
CNPC is now producing from its site, the earliest possible production date now
reported for Aynak is 2016. Clearly geography is something that has played in
CNPC’s favor: northern Afghanistan is a relatively safe area compared to Logar
province where Aynak lies.
The bigger question for China’s incoming
leaders is how they are going to address Afghanistan once the US and Nato
withdraw their primary responsibility for the country in 2014. China is not
expected to take on a larger security role in the country: the PLA has little
experience in such environments and such an aggressive approach is a world away
from China’s non-interference policy.
China’s primary foreign policy tool
is investment, mostly in Afghanistan’s natural resources: something it knows how
to do very well from years of experience in frontier markets. However, this does
not seem to be working in Afghanistan, with the government reportedly asking MCC
to stay in Afghanistan. According to the Wikileak cable, Heting told American
diplomats in October 2009 that ‘the Chinese government was urging the company to
honour its commitments’.
The CNPC project may now be working, but the
initial problems show that generous deals are no guarantee of a smooth passage.
Beijing clearly has to re-think what it is going to do once 2014 passes.
Afghanistan’s proximity to China and the potential knock-on implications in
central Asia where China has invested a great deal make it is impossible to
ignore.
China may not want to be dragged into Afghanistan’s interminable
problems, but it seems impossible to imagine that they are not going to play
some role. What this role ends up being is something that the new administration
needs to calculate sooner than it wants.
Ends
SA/EN
Home »
» Guest post: China in Afghanistan, a tale of two mines
Guest post: China in Afghanistan, a tale of two mines
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment